LDL – It’s not the “Bad Cholesterol” – That’s Simplistic Foolery in Light of 21st Century Science

UPDATE 9th Oct 2016: Just got this article on the debacle:  https://thefatemperor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/137k-Patients-Low-LDL-high-CHD-Article-UCLA.pdf

I had approximated that around 20% of these guys were on lipid-lowering medication, which didn’t change the absurdity of the result. At all. But now this article verifies it – only 21% were on the cholesterol-attacking sauce. Also LDL can drop slightly in the 24 hours or so after problems like MI occur – but these were “admission LDL’s” – blood draws taken after the guys arrived at hospital in a panic. What a farce…original blog post continues below:

Interesting twitter chat with foremost Lipid Expert Dr. Thomas Dayspring this evening – he has acknowledged the following histograms I put together, so I feel comfortable posting them(!). Basically, the Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Histograms (Red Bars) are from a 2009 report which measured the LDL values for >130,000 people admitted with CAD issues. I pulled the US general population LDL distribution from a similar timeframe, and averaged it to match the gender split of the CAD cohort (…Green Bars). The message is:- the majority of Myocardial Infarctions (Heart Attacks) are now driven by Insulin Resistance and excessive sugar & carbohydrate in the diet, helped by Magnesium, sunlight/D, Omega3 and other nutrient deficiencies, along with excessive Omega 6 (Note – IR with concurrent Hyperinsulinemia, not the ‘physiological IR of a low-carber). Reply from Dr. Dayspring: “Current NHANES data: majority of MI are explained by IR. But real message is unless >200 mg/dL – LDLc is terrible biomarker”. And indeed it is – LDL should never be used to diagnose, as can be seen from my graph below (Red = Coronary Disease people, Dark Green = general population).

The Coronary Disease bus is now being driven by excess sugar/carb and probably the putrid veg oils – hence the low LDL levels seen in the afflicted. Now, if you tested them for LDL-P (the particle count), you would get a slightly different story – but ‘cholesterol’ is still largely junk-science – only a problem when yer Lipoproteins are damaged…or when there are far more important underlying causes at play.

the papers: CAD patients: http://www.ahjonline.com/…/S0002-8703%2808…/fulltext and NHANES data for population: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/106/25/3237.full

Does LDL have some predictive power when measured long in advance of the disease that drives heart attacks (i.e. the inflammatory milieu)? In spite of being a junk biomarker, it has some – that’s how it fooled them all decades ago. It depends totally on HDL value and much else though – which speaks to the core mechanisms. The following plot from Framingham illustrates:

LDL is intimately interactional with HDL and other properties. Because Insulin Resistance is the primary driver of heart attacks. LDL will fool you into the ground.

LDL is just a misleading messenger…of the real deal.

Share This

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email
Subscribe to the NewsletterGuaranteed no spam stuff, just great unbiased health science – thanks for joining up !