Let’s Play the 25(OH)D Guessing Game – How Low can you Go?

Feel like ejecting a D debacle snippit this evening – the recognized experts in the field are all aligned on 32ng/ml being the minimum safe level, and PTH speaks to that also; arguably 40ng/ml would be a more optimal point. So what is the US population distribution – prize for the best guess is a properly functioning immune system!

No cheating – who got it?

Note: the horizontal % bars here show the observed percentage reductions associated with being HIGHER in 25(OH)D. For the cancer example, studies suggested being up at 38ng/ml might lower cancer rate by 35%, while being up at 52ng/ml might lower by up to 75%. Please do note that these are associational and case-control studies – they show that higher D tracks with much lower disease rates, but they don’t PROVE that the D did it. But knowing the mechanisms now, and having studied widely, the preponderance of the data says that D has a strong causal nature in lowering disease like seen. In the seminar, I have a few actual experiments that illustrate the point, but sadly very few proper experiments have been carried out, at least the way I would have done them – with appropriate dosage, tracking of the physiological D levels attained, and proper control of the placebo group (it’s amazing – some experiments gave tiny doses, and allowed everyone including placebo group to take D supplements willy-nilly).
 

Share This

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email
Subscribe to the NewsletterGuaranteed no spam stuff, just great unbiased health science – thanks for joining up !